eGrid Subregion | Grid Output | GHG | lb GHG per MWh |
---|---|---|---|
MROW (MRO West) | Total output | CO₂ | 995.80000 |
MROW (MRO West) | Total output | CH₄ | 0.10700 |
MROW (MRO West) | Total output | N₂O | 0.01500 |
MROW (MRO West) | Total output | CO₂ | 1821.84000 |
MROW (MRO West) | Total output | CH₄ | 0.02800 |
MROW (MRO West) | Total output | N₂O | 0.03071 |
Appendix A — Supplementary data
A.1 Emissions factors
Note for solid waste, the global warming potentials used to calculate CO2e are sourced AR4, not AR5, like the rest of our inventory. However, documentation for the EPA WARM tool (USEPA 2019), indicates that the differences in total CO2e emissions is negligible.
All EPA Emission Factor Hub values were pulled from an Excel workbook downloaded from the EPA website. Values were processed in epa_ghg_factor_hub.R.
Fuel type | GHG | GHG Quantity | Unit | Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas | ||||
Natural Gas | CO₂ | Kilograms | mmBtu | 53.06000 |
Natural Gas | CH₄ | Grams | mmBtu | 1.00000 |
Natural Gas | N₂O | Grams | mmBtu | 0.10000 |
Natural Gas | CO₂ | Kilograms | scf | 0.05444 |
Natural Gas | CH₄ | Grams | scf | 0.00103 |
Natural Gas | N₂O | Grams | scf | 0.00010 |
Petroleum Products | ||||
Kerosene | CO₂ | Kilograms | mmBtu | 75.20000 |
Kerosene | CH₄ | Grams | mmBtu | 3.00000 |
Kerosene | N₂O | Grams | mmBtu | 0.60000 |
Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel | CO₂ | Kilograms | mmBtu | 72.22000 |
Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel | CH₄ | Grams | mmBtu | 3.00000 |
Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel | N₂O | Grams | mmBtu | 0.60000 |
Propane | CO₂ | Kilograms | mmBtu | 62.87000 |
Propane | CH₄ | Grams | mmBtu | 3.00000 |
Propane | N₂O | Grams | mmBtu | 0.60000 |
Material | Metric tons CO₂e per short ton material |
---|---|
Recycled | |
Mixed Recyclables | 0.09 |
Mixed Organics | NA |
Mixed MSW | NA |
Landfilled | |
Mixed Recyclables | 0.68 |
Mixed Organics | 0.48 |
Mixed MSW | 0.52 |
Combusted | |
Mixed Recyclables | 0.11 |
Mixed Organics | 0.05 |
Mixed MSW | 0.43 |
Composted | |
Mixed Recyclables | NA |
Mixed Organics | 0.17 |
Mixed MSW | NA |
A.1.1 Transportation emissions rates
We can calculate gross emissions rates in grams emitted per vehicle mile traveled for each county by combining the historical VMT (Section 2.2.2), VMT forecasts, (Section 2.2.3), compiled historical annual emissions (Section 2.2.1), and emissions forecasts (Section 2.2.3.2).
These emissions rates are comprehensive, in that they do not account for differences in vehicle or fuel type.
Compilation provided in calc_gross_emissions_rates.R.
The Council does not currently run MOVES for counties outside the core metro region. For collar counties (Sherburne, Chisago, Pierce, St. Croix), we calculated the change in emissions from 2022 to 2050 in the most similar core county and applied this value to 2022 county-specific emissions.
Future work will complete MOVES runs for all counties, including the 4 collar counties.
County | VMT data source | Emissions data source | Grams CO₂e per vehicle mile traveled |
---|---|---|---|
Anoka | RTDM | RTDM and EPA MOVES4 | 253.814 |
Carver | RTDM | RTDM and EPA MOVES4 | 254.754 |
Chisago | RTDM | Expected change in emissions in similar county | 472.948 |
Dakota | RTDM | RTDM and EPA MOVES4 | 253.399 |
Hennepin | RTDM | RTDM and EPA MOVES4 | 255.698 |
Pierce | RTDM | Expected change in emissions in similar county | 513.201 |
St. Croix | RTDM | Expected change in emissions in similar county | 549.148 |
Ramsey | RTDM | RTDM and EPA MOVES4 | 251.567 |
Scott | RTDM | RTDM and EPA MOVES4 | 255.913 |
Sherburne | RTDM | Expected change in emissions in similar county | 390.802 |
Washington | RTDM | RTDM and EPA MOVES4 | 256.877 |
A.2 Global Warming Potential (GWP)
The Global Warming Potential (GWP) was developed to allow comparisons of the global warming impacts of different gases. Specifically, it is a measure of how much energy the emissions of 1 ton of a gas will absorb over a given period of time, relative to the emissions of 1 ton of carbon dioxide (CO2). The larger the GWP, the more that a given gas warms the Earth compared to CO2 over that time period (USEPA 2023).
Across all sectors, we used the GWP values established in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 6th Assessment Report (AR6), Table 7.SM.7 (IPCC 2023). We processed these values in global_warming_potential.R.
Gas | 100-year GWP value | Source |
---|---|---|
1 Hydrofluorocarbon-152a, Difluoroethane |
A.3 Geographic data
Geographic data were processed in cprg_geography.R.
A.3.1 Counties
County data was pulled using {tigris}
, an R package that downloads TIGER/Line shapefiles from the US Census Bureau (Walker 2023). 2021 geographies for Minnesota and Wisconsin were pulled, combined, and saved.
Column | Class | Description |
---|---|---|
Additionally, population estimates were obtained from the American Community Survey 5-Year estimates (2017-2021) using {tidycensus}
(U.S. Census Bureau 2021).
Column | Class | Description |
---|---|---|
A.3.2 Cities
Minnesota cities, townships, and unorganized territories were imported from Minnesota Geospatial Commons (MnDOT 2023).
Wisconsin cities, towns, and villages were imported from Wisconsin’s Legislative Technology Services Bureau (Wisconsin Legislature 2023).
Data from both states was then combined and filtered to include only the workplan area counties.
Column | Class | Description |
---|---|---|